GLOBAL CENTER STAGE

October 2012

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Arab Awakening
Morocco’s Genteel Arab Spring
  

By Atul Razdan                                   

The promises of the new government notwithstanding, many Moroccans express scepticism and are quite cynical regarding the elected officials udies;   

    

   

The Kingdom of Morocco, a part of the Maghreb region, shares cultural, historical and linguistic ties with other countries of the region. It has a 99 percent Arab Berber population; the remaining population comprising Christians and a small Jewish community. The country is a constitutional parliamentary monarchy, with King Mohammed VI as the current Monarch and an elected bicameral Parliament, comprising the Majlis an Nuwab (the Assembly of Representatives, 395 members elected for a five year term) and the Majlis al Mutasharin (the Assembly of Councillors, 270 members, elected for a nine year term). Opposition political parties are legal and the country has a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government and legislative power rests with both the government and the bicameral Parliament.

Morocco is a country of contrasts. There is no denying this country has tremendous attraction for the very rich, seeing the relative freedom it has from strict Islamic mores. The gap between the rich and poor in the country, however, is one of the widest in the Arab world. Some experts state that about 15 percent of the population live on an income of $2 per day. The literacy rate is slightly above 50 percent and analysts feel there is lack of opportunity and uncertainty about the future among the younger generation. Unemployment in Morocco stands at 19.1 percent of the working population in 2012.

Movement for Change

A restless and dissatisfied younger generation is the surest recipe for political upheaval. So it was in Morocco, where the people in the tens of thousands, taking the Arab Spring in the region for inspiration, started demonstrating peacefully in the capital, Rabat, on February 20, 2011. People also demonstrated in other cities, like Casablanca, Marrakesh, Tangiers, Fez and Aghadir and organised an umbrella organisation, called the “February 20 Movement for Change”. The groups comprising this movement were the Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH) and the United Socialist Party (PSU), a leftist group. The Islamic Justice and Charity Organisation (JCO-Al Adl Wal Ihsan), an Islamic party keen to take advantage of the situation also joined the protest.

The spark was provided by a group of young Moroccans, who called for these demonstrations through a YouTube video that stated their demands for freedom and equality. The demonstrators called on King Mohammad VI to reduce his own powers in politics through changes in the constitution, dismiss his government and eliminate corruption. The people did not want removal of the king, but called a new constitution, under which they would be “citizens and not subjects”. The institution of the Monarchy remained inviolate, but Prime Minister Abbas El Fassi and his numerous family members holding government posts, came in for sustained criticism for corruption.

The demonstrations, however, soon turned violent when a bank in the northern city of Al Hoceima was set ablaze by rioters. Interior Ministry sources said that they had recovered five charred bodies from the wreckage. Another 120 people were arrested in the unrest. The injured numbered 128, including 115 members of the security forces. There were incidents of stone throwing and the police were reported to have used tear gas to control crowds. In the northern town of Larache there were reports of “rioters and ex-convicts” having entered the customs building and looting confiscated drugs and alcohol.

A Slew of Reforms

The king was, thereafter, quick to announce impending change in a speech on March 9. He announced the establishment of a committee, aimed at preparing the draft of a new constitution which would, inter alia, place further limitations on the powers of the monarch. The committee was headed by Abdellatif Menouni, an advisor of the king, and a clear indication of where the inspiration for the new constitution would lie. He also promised the creation of a new national human rights body and early legislative elections. The monarch additionally pledged to strengthen economic regulations, improve transparency in the public procurement process, reform the justice sector, advance government decentralisation and expand press freedom.

The constitutional reforms were voted in on July 1. The amended constitution, inter alia, stated that the king would appoint the prime minister from the party that won the most seats in the elections, instead of the earlier practice of nominating a technocrat to the post if no party enjoyed a decisive edge in the elections. The king’s power to appoint persons to high office was passed on to the premier, as was the power to dissolve Parliament, and the premier would also preside over the council of government, which prepares general policy of the state, a position held earlier by the King. The king, however, retained control of the armed forces, security issues, foreign policy, religion and the authority of dismissing the prime minister.

The Promise of a New Tomorrow?

In September, the promised legislative elections were held and resulted in a victory for the Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD), which won 107 seats, twice as many as its nearest competitor (the nationalist conservative Istiqlal Party, which won 60 seats). PJD General Secretary Abdelilah Benkirane was subsequently named the head of the new government. One thing became immediately clear – despite Morocco’s modernist credentials and relaxed environment, the appeal of religion was strong. Benkirane, who does not have an absolute majority in Parliament, heads a coalition government, comprising the Istiqlal, Popular Movement (MP-32 seats) and Part of Progress and Socialism (PPS-18 seats). The PJD has announced that the new government’s top priority would be, inter alia, to fight corruption, foster equitable economic development and promote social justice and to “reform within stability, a third way between revolution and authoritarianism”.

The promises of the new government notwithstanding, many Moroccans express scepticism and are quite cynical regarding the elected officials. Some people wonder if the PJD led government would be any different from earlier corrupt and ineffectual governments. The continuation of violent clashes between the police and youth in Taiz, after the new government took over, gives credence to this line of thought. The government’s promise of ending unemployment totally evaporated soon after the government came to power and in February 2012, one more unemployed youth, Abdelwahab Zaidoun, set himself afire and died in Rabat. The anger of the people against the “bearded government”, as it is sarcastically referred to in the press, does not arise only out of the confrontation with the police. There is a feeling in a section of Morocco’s society that the arrival of the Islamists in government was little more than political manipulation by the government.

Despite the animosity that exists between the protestors and the police, the Moroccan “Arab Spring” is relatively genteel and the king seems to have avoided the upheaval that took place in other regional Arab countries. The most controversial issue that surfaced during the debate over the constitution related to whether Morocco would be defined as an Islamic state. This issue highlights the problem that exists between the Islamist parties and the ‘civil’ ones, this being a diplomatic nicety to describe ‘secular’ parties, the latter term being almost an anathema in classical Islam. For the time being, however, even the PJD and its leader, Benkirane are strong defenders of the Monarchy. The king is revered and respected by all Moroccans, who regard Mohammad VI as sincere, hard working and good hearted.

The Future of Liberal Morocco

As such, Morocco’s version of the Arab Spring will remain essentially civilised; a movement confined to securing political and economic reform without threatening the present system. The country is viewed by the United States Government as an important ally in the fight against terrorism and an important trade partner. It is the recipient of US foreign assistance funding for counterterrorism and socioeconomic development. Sale of US defence equipment is also authorised to Morocco and, in 2004, US President George Bush designated Morocco as a major non-NATO ally. The US strongly supports the Moroccan Monarchy and the country’s political reform efforts. In today’s unipolar world, Morocco’s future is safe from organised turmoil.

The country is far too liberal in its approach to fall victim in the foreseeable future to the efforts of radical Islam. The days of popular movements like the French Revolution have long gone and no likelihood exists of opposition elements being nurtured by international players to the point of revolution, as they were in Libya and Syria. As such, the Moroccan opposition will continue its civilised protests for political change and the monarchy, which is well set, will continue liberalising political life in the country.

 
Atul Razdan is a retired officer of the Research and Analysis Wing, India’s external intelligence agency and a former journalist, who worked for the Hindustan Times.        

Go to Content