GLOBAL CENTER STAGE

January 2012

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

‘The Commonwealth is not about government,
but about its citizens’

                        

Mr. Kamalesh Sharma, a seasoned Indian diplomat and former Indian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, was recently re-appointed as the Commonwealth Secretary-General for a four-year term beginning April 2012. In an interview with Yamini Chowdhury, Associate Editor, Diplomatist, the Secretary-General of the 54-nation grouping elaborated on a wide-range of issues, from the relevance of the grouping in the 21st century to the judicious utilization of the Commonwealth’s potential.

 
   

How do you feel the Commonwealth can remain an important international organisation? How do you think the organisation, representing 54 nations, must evolve to be considered more relevant, innovative and flexible in today’s times? How do you feel a value-based organisation like the Commonwealth can fulfil the constantly evolving global expectations of all its member states?

The fact that our membership has grown from eight countries in 1949 to fifty four today, with countries still applying to join, gives some measure of the relevance and attractiveness of the Commonwealth, not just to us but to others. This is because of the wisdom, ambition, contribution and values-orientation that have always been hallmarks of the Commonwealth. The diversity and range of our membership mean that what works as a way forward for us is already potentially a global idea which will work for the wider international community. The consensus, practical initiatives and innovative approaches arising from Commonwealth ministerial meetings also enable us to give ideas to the world, apart from the meetings of our Heads.

Regular Commonwealth engagement, whether intergovernmental of through civil society, ensures that the cross-connecting links, the lattice-work of our Commonwealth networks, are kept in good repair and multiply. They also allow for lessons learnt, and progress made, in one part of our family of nations to be readily shared with others.

At the recent Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Perth, our leaders took bold decisions that will shape the Commonwealth of the future. They resolved to ‘maintain the Commonwealth’s relevance, to ensure its effectiveness in responding to contemporary global challenges’.

The Commonwealth is not just about government but about its citizens. We have a vast network of civil society links and professional associations. We are keeping up with the times by developing an ambitious Commonwealth Connects portal, an internet gateway to generate information and awareness and lead to a proliferation of partnerships.

Have the core values of the association changed or evolved over the past 40 years? How do you think it has been able to deliver on the three major agendas – governance, growth and social mobility?

Collectively, the Commonwealth has always sought to be forward-looking, fitting itself to the changing context of the contemporary world and addressing emerging challenges, particularly to the small and the vulnerable that tend to get marginalised in international discourse. Democracy, development and diversity lie at the heart of what we do in the Commonwealth.

The standards to which our members commit themselves, and which they expect of one another, have been set out over the years in a body of declarations, communiqués and plans for practical action. In the Affirmation of Values and Principles made at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in 2009, member governments renewed their commitment to our values, including democracy, the rule of law, sustainable development and human rights. And they refreshed their commitment to our principles, including consensus and common action, mutual respect, inclusiveness, transparency, accountability, legitimacy and responsiveness.

The search to find ways of realising these ambitions, of translating words into action, is seen in initiatives such as the Commonwealth Electoral Network which aims to set a gold standard in the Commonwealth for the conduct of elections and hopefully worldwide, and which is the bedrock on which enlightened governance in the service of the people and parliamentary accountability are built.

There are many other examples of ideas developed within the Commonwealth that have been globally adopted. In some cases the thinking has become so widely accepted and mainstream that its Commonwealth origins are lost sight of or how innovative it seemed when first suggested, and what an important contribution to the global good it was when developed by the Commonwealth and presented to the wider international community as a new way forward.

Our Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative was one which encouraged coherence in the approach to debt management of the economically most fragile states. The initiative helps countries manage old and new debt in a sustainable way through a combination of sound policies, relief and aid inflows. We offer legal advice to countries in dealing with creditors and our technical advisers help strengthen internal and negotiating capacity. There is also our sophisticated Commonwealth Debt Management System (CDMS) software which is now used in more than fifty countries and enables them to record and monitor both domestic and external debt.

The Commonwealth Teacher and Health Workers Recruitment Protocols have been adopted by international organisations such as UNESCO, the ILO, WHO, the African Union and the Organization of American States. It aims to balance the rights of teachers to migrate internationally, on a temporary or permanent basis, against the need to protect the integrity of national education and health systems, and to prevent the exploitation of the scarce human resources of poor countries. It also seeks to promote the positive benefits, which international teacher migration can bring, while safeguarding the rights of recruited teachers and conditions relating to their service in the recruiting country.

We pioneered the science of Small States and attach high priority to supporting their integration into the global economy, building their resilience and competitiveness, and helping them to take advantage of the opportunities as well as to meet the challenges arising from globalisation. Such countries face special challenges – limited diversification, limited capacity, poverty, susceptibility to natural disasters and environmental change, remoteness and isolation. We help so that their voices are heard whenever their interests are involved.

One very practical step we took earlier this year was to open a Small States Office in Geneva. It provides subsidised office space for the diplomatic missions of Commonwealth Small States and two of its organisations. This enables countries and organisations to establish permanent diplomatic presence in the region and in the many multilateral organisations, including the three trade-related and health, human rights and labour-related UN organisations. It can serve as a hub and business centre both for tenants and visiting Small States delegations with support from resident technical experts on trade and human rights.

As regional blocs like the EU and African Union acquire a greater clout on the world stage, do you feel the Commonwealth is in danger of being side-lined?

An association that represents a third of the population of the world and embraces 54 nations spanning six continents and oceans is not one to be side-lined. The ability in international relations, in the compacting world of today, to have the flexibility of networks rather than the rigidity of blocs, is a strength. In this respect we feel, as so often, that the Commonwealth is ahead of the curve.

We have direct partnerships and links through our members with regional bodies in many parts of the world – in fact a number of them, such as the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, the Biketawa Declaration of the Pacific Islands Forum and CARICOM in the Caribbean, drew directly on their experience in the Commonwealth when framing their own goals and value setting. In this way, the Commonwealth has contributed to the entrenchment of the culture of democracy.

The comparative advantage of the Commonwealth lies in being able to add value. Although the staff and budget of the Commonwealth Secretariat are modest compared to many international organisations, even with some NGOs, we have a Universalist ethos, an inclusive vision and an ability to mobilise these in practical action. We see far but we have toolkits in our hands.

The Commonwealth has been involved in substantive issues in the rule of law, the culture of democracy, and the freedoms and rights of the citizens. What do you think are the major issues of moral or ethical nature that might affect the Commonwealth in the future?

Members of the Commonwealth have a commitment to shared values and principles. These encompass basic freedoms and rights of the individual and the citizen. Recently, our Heads of Government at Perth took another significant step in safeguarding these values further. In opting for reform and renewal of the Commonwealth, the Heads have empowered the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group to be more engaged in core areas such as respecting constitutionalism, rights of the political opposition, independence of the judiciary and a level playing field for the media. This will go a long way in entrenching Commonwealth values and ethically sustainable societies.

How has the creation of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) helped in initiating reform and renewal of the Commonwealth?

The world saw a historic stirring – a youth quake – among the young in 2011. Most societies are being rapidly transformed in their age distribution. Sixty percent of Commonwealth citizens are twenty nine or under and represent the true potential of our societies. The rightful place and contribution of our women, responsive governance and expectations of the citizens, economic pressures of a volatile global economy are other challenges to the environment of policy. Given this transformation, it was timely that our priorities and mechanisms for both value creation and wealth creation were constructively scrutinised.

Our leaders permitted the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group to recommend how the fundamental values of the Commonwealth, of the culture of democracy, human rights and the rule of law could be further safeguarded and advanced. We will now engage earlier and more constructively than in the past – and on a wider range of issues – to actively uphold and secure our fundamental values and aspirations as partners and in a positive spirit, where serious or frequent violations may be involved.

The Eminent Persons Group, which I convened at the direction of the Heads to run a fresh eye over the Commonwealth, put forward a range of options for sharpening our impact, strengthening our networks and raising our profile. It consisted of members outside government and the more than one hundred recommendations covered the whole range of democracy, development and diversity which drive our association. Some of their recommendations have been adopted and others will be assessed further for decisions to be taken well before the year is over. Leaders also accepted the recommendation of the EPG that there should be a Charter of the Commonwealth and there will now be a process of consultation in member countries so that a broad range of views can inform the process of formulating the Charter.

The Group laid special emphasis on our being a ‘Commonwealth of the People’. The vitality we draw from civil society, from business and from our youth was on display in Perth as never before. The reform and renewal, for which CHOGM 2011 will be remembered, help bring the ambition of the inter-governmental Commonwealth and the expectations of the people’s Commonwealth together.

How do you feel the Commonwealth has fared in the fulfilment of the Millennium Development Goals? Are you satisfied with the gains made in parts of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa?

Our commitment to parliamentary democracy and responsive public administration are enormously valuable assets in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. The signs are that the target least likely to be achieved is MDG 5 – Improving Maternal Health. Latest UN data shows that, although there have been considerable advances; the maternal mortality ratio is declining at too slow a rate across the Commonwealth. This is a big concern for the Commonwealth. Maternal mortality in childbirth is a global outrage and at the G-20 in Canada, we advocated the slogan ‘Half a million midwives’ to meet the scandal of recorded deaths each year in childbirth.

Making a difference is our aim – and our role in expressing the concerns of the ninety per cent of the world’s countries which do not have a seat at the G20 table is now established. Our meetings successively with Canada, South Korea and, most recently, France have enabled us to be a conduit through which the priorities of small states and vulnerable states, all of which influence the achievement of the MDGs, can be represented to the G20.

Five Commonwealth members are in the G20. This provides a vital opportunity for creative dialogue and enables us to work on the shared and priority concerns of all Commonwealth members. The G20 needs to regard itself as the ‘T20’, trustees of the wider world. This has special relevance for global progress towards the MDGs.

We back our global advocacy with practical interventions such as by supporting the East, Central and Southern African Health Community on aligning quality standards of nursing and midwifery practice with global standards and strengthening the capacity of professional councils. This work is being implemented in nine Commonwealth countries of the ECSA Health Community, namely Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Seychelles, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.

This year, our Commonwealth theme is ‘Women as Agents of Change’, which resonates with MDG 3 – Promoting Gender Equality and Empowering Women. In the 2009 Commonwealth Affirmation of Values and Principles, our Heads reiterated as a core Commonwealth value ‘reaffirming gender equality and empowerment as an essential component of human development and basic human rights’. It is a goal we constantly pursue, and we revise our practical interventions to reflect contemporary needs.

Since women’s health is a determinant in their ability to play a leading role and contribute equally to development, MDG 6 – Combating HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Other Diseases - is closely linked to all our work on the economic and social empowerment of women. Shortage of health workers as a development concern is one of the most serious constraints to scaling up the response to HIV/AIDS and to the achievement of the MDGs. Through our Commonwealth recruitment protocols for health workers we have made a contribution in a contentious sphere where international movements of skills and labour can severely undermine capacity and development in poor countries. The Commonwealth assists the goal of universal primary education through projects in multi-grade teaching to alleviate the shortage of teachers.

Considering the sheer numbers in terms of diverse faiths, races and cultures, there is no doubt that the Commonwealth has tremendous potential. How do you believe that this potential can be utilized more judiciously?

An important quality of the global value of the Commonwealth is that it is about more than governments; it is not only meetings of Heads of Government and of ministers that drive us forward. There are more than ninety accredited Commonwealth civil society organisations and they have held an integral place in our machinery of consultation and collaboration since the early days of the modern Commonwealth. The meeting of Commonwealth Heads is inseparable from the CHOGM as a concourse also of civil society, the young and the business community.

In fact, it was a pioneering act of remarkable foresight as long ago as 1965 on the part of our leaders to create, alongside the intergovernmental Secretariat, the Commonwealth Foundation in order to strengthen what might be called the ‘people’s’ dimension of our association. Perhaps long before the term ‘civil society’ became common currency, Heads of Government created a special place for professional, technical and other voluntary bodies at the heart of the Commonwealth as collaborators working towards our shared goals.

Both the intergovernmental Commonwealth as well as the Commonwealth Foundation, Commonwealth Youth Programme (perhaps the world’s oldest from 1974), the Commonwealth Business Council, the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the Commonwealth Local Government Forum and the other bodies give expression to the geographical, cultural and social diversity we embrace, and also remind us that our member countries enjoy many shared features in their parliamentary, judicial, legal, educational, administrative and other systems. Such commonality of language binds us together, both metaphorically and literally.

Considering the enormous variety in the Commonwealth in every respect, a remarkable feature of the Commonwealth is how rapidly we are able to engage gear. Our recently launched internet platform, Commonwealth Connects, offers new opportunities for mutual learning, engagement and collaboration. It serves as an innovative exchange, a new shared workplace where the Commonwealth can create and experience a new form of partnership. Going forward, the youth must be a special focus for such partnerships in all its possibilities.

 

Go to Content